Ananya Saikia, a youth leader from Assam and spokesperson of the Assam Jatiya Parishad (AJP), has emerged as a vocal critic of the government among the state’s younger generation. A former general secretary of the student-run Indian Students Organization, she has been actively engaged in political discourse from a young age.
In this conversation with Shrijoni Rabha, Saikia speaks about youth participation, governance, and the evolving political landscape ahead of the Assam Assembly elections.
Shrijoni Rabha: What first drew you toward political awareness and activism? How has your perspective on Assam’s politics evolved over time?
Ananya Saikia: I grew up in a family where discussions at the dining table often revolved around politics and social reform. My grandmother was actively involved in public life, and I was very close to her. From a very young age—around three or four—I would accompany her to public meetings.
That exposure shaped my understanding early on. I realized that politics is ultimately driven by ordinary people—their needs, their voices, and their choices.
There is a common notion that politics is a “dirty game,” and many people take pride in calling themselves apolitical. But the moment you turn 18 and cast your first vote, you become part of politics. You choose a candidate or a party based on certain beliefs—that itself is political participation.
In fact, politics influences our daily lives in ways we often overlook—from the price of essential goods to public transport fares and taxes. No one is truly apolitical.
I strongly believe more young people should come forward—not necessarily to contest elections, but to raise their voices, question policies, and speak for the voiceless. Politics is not limited to holding office; it is about engagement and accountability.
What role does social media play in shaping political awareness among the youth?
Social media has become a powerful tool for political expression. Earlier, there was a clear gap between leaders and the public. Today, that gap has significantly reduced.
Platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter) allow people to directly express their views. If you are unhappy with a policy or decision, you can voice it instantly—and it can reach your elected representatives.
However, the responsibility lies with the public to use these platforms constructively. Social media can be a powerful instrument for awareness, but only if used wisely.
How important is youth participation in politics?
India is one of the youngest countries in the world, and a large portion of voters are youth. Yet, decision-making often remains concentrated among older leaders.
There is a generational gap. While senior leaders bring experience, younger leaders are often better equipped to understand contemporary issues—technology, education, employment, and urban challenges.
Younger leaders today are raising issues like AI, education reform, traffic management, and urban infrastructure—concerns that directly affect the youth.
There is also a need to discuss retirement in politics. Senior leaders can act as mentors, guiding younger leaders rather than holding positions indefinitely.
Many people believe experienced leaders are more credible. How do you respond to that?
That perception exists, but it is gradually changing. During campaign visits across Assam, there has been visible public support for young leaders.
People, especially the youth, are voluntarily stepping forward to support new candidates—even contributing financially. This indicates a strong desire for change.
The idea that only experienced leaders are credible is often promoted by those unwilling to step aside. In reality, people want fresh perspectives and new leadership.
How do you assess governance and development in Assam today?
Development is a continuous process. Infrastructure projects like flyovers and hospitals have been built over decades by different governments.
The real issue is the quality and purpose of development. Building infrastructure alone is not enough. Many government schools are being shut down, and there is increasing privatization.
Hospitals may exist, but many lack adequate doctors, equipment, and proper systems. In Guwahati, the promise of a “smart city” remains unfulfilled, with recurring waterlogging and power issues.
Environmental degradation is another major concern. Development cannot come at the cost of sustainability.
What is your view on election manifestos and promises?
Manifestos should reflect serious planning, not just election rhetoric.
The focus should be on long-term solutions—education, skill development, and economic empowerment. Freebies may provide temporary relief, but they are not sustainable.
Real development lies in creating opportunities that allow people to become economically independent.
Do you think there is a gender imbalance in politics?
Yes, there is a clear gender imbalance. The number of women candidates remains low.
However, it is encouraging to see more first-time women candidates emerging. Earlier, many women in politics came from established political families, but that is slowly changing.
Women’s issues can only be properly addressed when women are adequately represented in decision-making roles.
Why are women still underrepresented in politics?
Women face multiple challenges. Many must first convince their families before entering politics. Then comes societal judgment, followed by challenges within political parties themselves.
These barriers discourage participation. However, the situation is gradually improving, with more women stepping forward.
Women must assert themselves and demand equal opportunities.
What is your view on the rise of personal attacks in political discourse?
Personal attacks often arise when there is a lack of substantive political issues to discuss.
Instead of focusing on governance and policy, the discourse becomes toxic. This is harmful to democracy.
Leaders should present their vision and solutions rather than targeting individuals.
Do shifting political alliances before elections strengthen or confuse democracy?
Alliances are a natural part of democracy. Different parties may come together based on shared principles, even if they have ideological differences.
While conflicts may arise initially, they reflect democratic functioning—dialogue and negotiation.
Ultimately, what matters is whether these alliances serve the people and uphold democratic values.