Tripura Congress
Tripura Pradesh Congress leaders submit memorandum to Governor in Agartala, opposing VB-GRAM-G Act and demanding restoration of MGNREGA rights. (Representational Photo)

Agartala: The Tripura Pradesh Congress on Tuesday submitted a memorandum to the Governor opposing the repeal and restructuring of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) and demanding its restoration in what it described as its โ€œoriginal right-based form.โ€

The party organised a โ€œLok Bhavan Marchโ€ in Agartala as part of the protest. The rally was stopped by security personnel near the Circuit House, officials said. A delegation of party leaders later proceeded to Raj Bhavan and handed over the memorandum.

Addressing the gathering, PCC president Asish Kumar Saha and AICC invitee member and MLA Sudip Roy Barman outlined the partyโ€™s objections to the newly enacted legislation, referred to in the memorandum as the VB-GRAM-G Act.

In the memorandum, the Congress stated, โ€œThe Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) has been the cornerstone of rural livelihood security, providing employment to 5โ€“6 crore families annually.โ€

It further said that the Act had โ€œreduced distress migrationโ€ and โ€œincreased rural wages,โ€ adding that direct bank payments benefited โ€œparticularly women, Dalits, Adivasis, and marginalized communities, with women accounting for nearly 60% of total workdays.โ€

The party recalled that the Act, enacted in 2005, was โ€œa right-based law that guaranteed every rural household the legal right to demand wage employment,โ€ and that the state government was required to provide work within 15 days of demand, failing which unemployment allowance was payable.

Expressing concern over the new legislation, the memorandum stated, โ€œThe new Act removes the legal guarantee of work, centralizes decision-making power with the Union Government, reduces the power of the State Government, and weakens Panchayats.โ€ It also alleged that โ€œthe new Act reduces the Union Governmentโ€™s wage contribution from 90% to 60%, thereby shifting the financial burden onto States and workers.โ€

The party further claimed that โ€œbudget-capped allocations, restrictions on work during agricultural seasons, and dilution of wage safeguards will inevitably lead to reduced employment, suppressed wages, and increased rural distress.โ€

It also objected to the removal of Mahatma Gandhiโ€™s name from the scheme, stating that it reflected an attempt to dilute the values underpinning the original legislation.

The memorandum said the Congress had opposed the Bill in Parliament, but it was passed and enacted. It informed the Governor that the Congress Working Committee had resolved to launch a nationwide movement titled โ€œMGNREGA Bachao Sangramโ€ to defend the right to work.

The party urged the Governor to take necessary steps in the matter, submitting the memorandum โ€œfor your kind perusal and necessary action.โ€